Book to movie adaptations; you either hate them or you love
them. Me, I’m somewhere in-between. Early on in my reading career I realized
that I was never going to be happy with adaptations unless I learned to
separate them in my mind. For the most part I do this pretty well; I am able to
pretend the book and the movie are two totally separate entities that just
happen to be about the same subject. Sometimes I even look forward to the movie
– I am not great a visualising things in my head and I like to have a visual of
a character. Of course this can very
easily go wrong. The worst things for me are bad casting and when they change
things for the movie that don’t need to be changed (this seems to happen a
lot). The one thing that is most important to me though is that I read the book
first. I want to form my own impressions and opinions before someone else tells
me what to see. All of this preamble is because my boyfriend has been trying to
get me to watch Child 44 with him for months. I have been putting it off and ignoring
him whenever he suggests it since I didn’t have the book and I am not supposed
to be buying any more books – so I was hoping that I could find it in a second
hand shop somewhere. AND I needed the copy WITHOUT the movie cover. (I know.
I’m picky.) Anyway! Trying to not make a long story any longer than I have
already made it – I was able to find a copy that met my needs and am now
reading it so that I don’t have to make Malcolm wait any longer!
All that being said – this is going to be one messed up
movie. Child 44 takes place in post war Russian, where the only crime that
exists is spying against the state. Anyone can be guilty of that crime – doing
anything out of your normal routine can cause you to become a suspect and once
you become a suspect you are automatically assumed guilty. Leo Demidov, an
idealistic security officer has his unwavering loyalty shaken when a series of
events leads him to believe that maybe the state isn’t as honest and absolute
as they purport. A little boy has been murdered and since murder doesn’t exist,
any investigation is being quashed, and Demidov discovers that maybe being
suspected of
This is another mid-point review, and of course, the mid-point
occurs exactly as things get interesting. Not that they weren’t already. Child
44 has so many layers that are so intricately woven… I wish I had better words
to describe it. Smith has done a brilliant job in recreating the fear and
oppression of Stalin’s Russia – a time a admittedly know nothing about. I’m not
sure how much of this story is historical, but I am really hoping none of it
is. The entire population lives in fear of the state, everyone and anyone
expects to be searched or followed at any given moment. Smith describes the
three levels of cells in the main state police building and I had shivers “some
were ankle deep in freezing water, the walls covered in mold and slime… there
were narrow closets, like wooden coffins, where bedbugs had been left to
multiply and in which a prisoner would remain, naked, feasted upon, until ready
to sign a confession… there were cork-lined rooms were prisoners were heated,
cooked by the building’s ventilation system, until blood seeped out of their
pores.”
There is also the relationship between Demidov and his wife,
Raisa. At first they seem like the perfect couple – both beautiful, Leo is the
strong, loyal policeman, and Raisa is the perfect Russian housewife. But things
there are not what they seem as well – which poor Demidov only learns after
their lives turn to hell. Smith has done a great job of creating their
characters and their relationship. No one is exactly what they seem, which
makes perfect sense given the temperament of the country in which they live.
Everyone must hide their secret selves, their desires and their fears. Only
when Leo and Raisa have gone through the worst, and somehow come out alive, can
they truly be honest with each other. This layer is truly brilliant, I must
say. As interested as I am in every other aspect of this story, this is one
that I am most enjoying. Their entire married lives they have never
communicated honestly with each other and watching them struggle now – to be
honest, to communicate when necessary, to throw off all of their assumptions…
Demidov also has to start being honest with himself, which may be even harder
“How different was he from his moral opposite? Was the difference merely that
Vasili was senselessly cruel while he’d been idealistically cruel? One was
empty, indifferent cruelty while the other was a principled, pretentious
cruelty which thought of itself as reasonable and necessary. But in real terms,
in destructive terms, there was little to separate the two men. Had Leo lacked
the imagination to realize what he was involved in? Or was it worse than that -
had he chosen not to imagine it? He’d shut down those thoughts, brushed them
aside.”
Watching Demidov now try to solve a crime is also slightly
horrifying. In a country where there is no crime, there is also no method of
dealing with it. Demidov has no forensic training and is doing his best with
the little information that he has. Most people are not willing to help; since
Demidov is mistrusted no one wants to get in trouble for helping him. This
brings another element that I am loving to the book. Demidov’s methods are all
based on his intuition – normally he decides who is guilty and finds (or makes
up) the evidence to convict them. This time he needs to find the evidence to
lead him in the right direction, and that’s not a path he is used to taking.
Smith leads us through Demidov’s mind as he plans and thinks and figures things
out in such a good way – you struggle right alongside of Demidov.
The only thing that has been bothering me is the blurb on
the back of the book. It states “But when a murderer kills at will and Leo dares
to investigate, the State’s obedient servant finds himself demoted and exiled.”
This is actually completely inaccurate. Demidov does not start his
investigation until after his demotion – which has nothing to do with the
murder. This is a pretty big distinction. Part of what makes Demidov so real is
that it takes the destruction of his glass castle to make him realize what is
real and what is important. He’s not a hero sacrificing everything for some
noble cause. He’s beaten and broken and trying his best to get by, trying his
best to sleep at night and trying to prove himself to Raisa and to himself.
Great review Sheila. Now I want to read the book!
ReplyDeleteWhy thank you! I'll lend it to you :)
ReplyDelete