“My head leaning against the carriage window, I watch these
houses roll past me like a tracking shot in a film. I see them as others do
not; even their owners probably don’t see them from this perspective. Twice a
day I am offered a view into other lives; just for a moment. There’s something
comforting about the sight of strangers safe at home.”
There have been a slew of bestsellers lately with each plot
more twisted and grotesque than the last. I guess you can call it the Gone Girl
affect; I am sure there is no one reading this review that has not read the
book or watched the movie, no one who does not know of the surprise twist. That’s
another popular plot design lately, the surprise devastating plot twist. Not
that I am complaining – I love being completely taken aback by an author. Being
able to surprise a reader, especially an avid reader is a pretty impressive
feat. It’s not just about adding something from out of the blue, it needs to
make sense with the plot, its needs to tie in nicely without being too obvious
or too out of left field, it needs to be believed, it needs to not be
predictable. It needs to be done right, and when it is the effects can be
devastating. The problem, of course, is that the more twisted books that are
published, the more people are going to anticipate a big twist, thus decreasing
the effects. Especially with the success of Gone Girl, every twisty book nowadays
is using it as a comparison, and knowing a twist is coming takes away half the
fun.
It’s funny, as I am writing this I am looking over my copy
of The Girl on the Train I see no actual comparisons to Gone Girl, but I know
that I have heard it from everyone I know who has read this book. And it’s not
hard to see it – although I think that I am finding Paula Hawkins’ book more
subtle but somehow more intense?? I know that doesn’t make any sense… In
Hawkins’ story, the eponymous girl on the train is Rachel Watson, a depressed,
overweight alcoholic who takes the train into London and back again every day.
The train always stops at the same place and Rachel has become slightly
obsessed with the couple who lives in the closest house. She has named them
(Jess and Jason) and made up lives for them, trying to forget her own life by
imagining the happiness in theirs. “I
can’t really see her of course. I don’t know if she paints, or whether Jason
has a great laugh, or whether Jess has beautiful cheekbones. I can’t see her
bone structure from here and I’ve never heard Jason’s voice… They’re a match,
they’re a set. They’re happy I can tell. They’re what I used to be, they’re Tom
and me, five years ago. They’re what I lost, they’re everything I want to be.” One
day Rachel witnesses something that she shouldn’t and the next day Jess, whose
real name is Megan, disappears. The story is told in alternating diary entries
from Rachel and Megan, and sometimes Anna, Megan’s neighbour and Rachel’s
ex-husbands new wife. None of them can be trusted. Rachel tells the story of
her failed marriage and descent into alcoholism, Megan tells of her weaknesses
and demons and Anna provides a too cheery account of her perfect life. All
three women are connected and I am pretty sure that all three are liars.
As Rachel embroils herself further and further into Megan’s
disappearance it’s harder and harder to know what is really happening and who
or what you can believe. I don’t want to spend too much time comparing this to
Gone Girl – but just to explain my earlier statement – you don’t know that
anyone is lying in Gone Girl, so you’re taking everything at face value for the
first half of the book. Here, you know everyone is cracked, so it puts you more
on guard. You know no one can be trusted… but it hard to tell what’s real and what’s
not and it’s impossible to figure out what has really happened! I’m still waiting for a twist, but I think the
genius of Hawkins is that even knowing what you do, you don’t really know
anything. Any twist that comes still has the potential to shock and awe. ( I am
not going to lie, I am kind of hoping that there is no twist… that maybe
Rachel can be trusted – I think that would end up being a bigger shock than
anything!)
The thing is, I find there is something (faintly)
sickeningly satisfying reading about completely messed up people. Reading about
someone more messed up than me, watching their slow descent, knowing that they
are probably lying to you… I think it might be messed up that I like it as much
as I do. But it’s like a train wreck. I can’t look away and I need to know what’s
happening. I want Rachel to redeem herself, I want her sadness to be true because it gives
her more humanity. But as she says herself ‘There have been many slips, on many
staircases’ so she’s never sure what one she may be lying about at any given
time, and if she doesn’t know… how are we to?
No comments:
Post a Comment